Author Archives: Chad Derrington

50 Years of the P-3 Orion

50 Years of the P-3 Orion
Posted by: “Marco P.J. Borst
Thu Mar 15, 2012

Maritime Patrol Association Heritage Dinner to Celebrate 50 Years of the P-3 Orion
JACKSONVILLE, FL – The Maritime Patrol Association (MPA) will celebrate 50 years of the P-3 Orion at their annual Heritage Dinner on March 28, 2012 onboard Naval Air Station Jacksonville.

“There are very few airplanes in the world that can tout the distinct honor of being in service for 50 years. This is testament to the ingenuity and innovation of the designers, manufacturers and assemblers who created the P-3 Orion,” said Lockheed Martin Vice President of P-3 Programs and Greenville Operations Ray Burick. “The P-3 is the world standard in maritime patrol and reconnaissance and will continue to serve operators around the globe for many more decades to come.”

The primary aircraft of the US Navy Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Force (MPRF), the P-3 Orion has aided in anti-submarine warfare since the early 1960s when it was introduced to the aviation community by aeronautics corporation Lockheed Martin. The P-3 turboprop was an answer to a late 1950s request by the Chief of Naval Operations for an aircraft with more cabin space, a larger radius and a longer endurance than its predecessor, the P-2 Neptune. In August of 1962, Patrol Squadron (VP) EIGHT took possession of the first P-3, and then in 1969, the final revamp of the Orion, the first “P-3C”, came online.

“From a tactical standpoint, this new ‘Charlie’ was a quantum leap in improved sensors, data processing, tactical displays, weapons delivery, and decision making assistance over any P-3 system flying at that time,” said CAPT Ron W. Martin, USN (Ret.), Patrol Squadron (VP) THIRTY’s first P-3C Project Officer. “We all knew Maritime Patrol was about to become a force to be reckoned with.”

A half century later, the celebration of the P-3C Orion comes at both a historic and pivotal point in the MPRF’s future. In June of this year, Jacksonville-based Patrol Squadron (VP) SIXTEEN will receive the first of a fleet of replacement aircraft for the P-3. The P-8A Poseidon, a multi-mission maritime aircraft developed by Boeing, will be the first jet-powered maritime patrol aircraft commandeered by the US Navy.

The Heritage Dinner will take place during the 2012 MPA Symposium week of March 27-30, 2012, onboard Naval Air Station Jacksonville. In addition to the dinner, symposium attendees can register for a host of events, including the P-8A Poseidon Roll-Out, Integrated Training Center dedication, a Flight Suit Social, golf tournament, 5K, and others. The Heritage Dinner, which will highlight the history and heritage of the last 50 years of the P-3 aircraft, will also serve as a ceremony for three new Hall of Honor inductees from the Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance community.

Interested parties can receive more information about the 2012 Symposium, as well as register online, by going to: www.maritimepatrolassociation.org/2012symposium

A 501(c)(3) Florida non-profit corporation established in 2011 and headquartered in Jacksonville, FL, the Maritime Patrol Association plans on being a premier professional organization representing the U.S. Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance community by promoting the use of the patrol and reconnaissance aircraft in the United States Navy. For more information, contact September Wilkerson, Executive Director, at (904) 563-4036 or info@maritimepatrolassociation.org; or check out the MPA website at www.maritimepatrolassociation.org.

Don’t miss the 2012 MPA Symposium! For all of the details, go to:
www.maritimepatrolassociation.org/2012symposium

Commander Naval Air Forces Visits Patrol Squadron Sixteen

Original article: http://www.c7f.navy.mil/news/2012/03-march/022.htm

By Lt. j.g. Michael Glynn
Posted: March 15, 2012

OKINAWA, Japan (March 11, 2012) - Vice Adm. Allen G. Myers, commander of Naval Air Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, addresses questions from Sailors assigned to Patrol Squadron (VP) 16. The "War Eagles" are deployed supporting Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Gulianna Mandigo)

OKINAWA, Japan – Vice Adm. Allen Myers, Commander Naval Air Forces, visited the ‘War Eagles’ of Patrol Squadron (VP) 16 on March 11th to meet with Sailors and witness current maritime patrol operations in the Western Pacific.

Myers held an all-hands ‘Admiral’s Call’ to answer questions and listen to feedback from aircrew and maintenance personnel. He shared his thoughts on the introduction of the P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft to the fleet. The ‘War Eagles’ are the first squadron to transition to the aircraft following their current deployment.

“The ‘War Eagles’ were chosen to lead the transition to the P-8 due to sustained performance and leadership,” said Myers. “It’s very important to lean forward during the transition as we bring the new capabilities of the Poseidon to the fleet.”

Myers also spoke about the evolving force structure and manning of Naval Aviation. He stressed the new capabilities that the P-8A was bringing to the fleet and the importance of being able to project power globally.

“The most critical mission we can perform is to protect the sea base,” said Myers. “The Poseidon is critical to that task and recapitalizing the maritime patrol community is our most important priority.”

“I was impressed to hear Admiral Myers speak about how important the P-8 program is to Naval Aviation,” said Naval Aircrewman Second Class Aaron Dial. “The chance to transition to a new job and a new platform is all we talk about.”

VP-16 is a maritime patrol squadron that conducts routine security, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. The squadron operates the P-3C Orion and is based ashore Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Fla. Following their current deployment they will transition to the new P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft. VP-16 is currently forward-deployed to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa and flies in support of Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet.

P-3 Orion Research Group website

Dear all,

I am proud to announce that we have just uploaded the new P-3 Orion Research Group website!!

Besides a completely new layout we added an important new feature: our P-3 Aircraft Location History Report (ALHR) has now been published online! This report is giving the entire service life history for each individual P-3 Orion in the world. Our ALHR was last published eleven years ago in our “P-3 Orion Volume 2” booklet. Last year we decided that we will not publish a third booklet and instead we have now published the ALHR online. And there is more: it’s our intention to publish an updated ALHR four times a year.

Another change to the website is the news section. In the past this wasn’t refreshed as often as we wanted. Next to the news section we published our “Orion Nieuws” in Dutch language as a PDF document on the website. We have decided to quit publishing this Dutch news issues and instead we now publish this news in English as an integrated part of the website. Also for the news section it is our intention to publish new issues four times a year.

Please be advised that some sections of the new website are still under construction. And the text of other sections (like the history, variants and operators sections) still need to be updated. This will be done over the next few weeks. And of course we will be adding more photos to the existing pages over the next few weeks too.

We hope you will enjoy the new layout and especially the P-3 Aircraft Location History Report.

Regards,
Marco P.J. Borst and Jaap Dubbeldam
P-3 Orion Research Group – The Netherlands

 

Visit the site at: http://www.p3orion.nl/index.html

Boeing delivers first production P-8A to U.S. Navy

http://www.seattlepi.com/business/boeing/article/Boeing-delivers-first-production-P-8A-to-U-S-Navy-3386899.php

737-based maritime patrol jet replacing P-3 Orion
AUBREY COHE, Seattle Post-Intelligencer
By AUBREY COHEN, SEATTLEPI.COM STAFF
Published 08:29 p.m., Tuesday, March 6, 2012

[nggallery id=21]

Boeing delivered the first production version of its new maritime patrol jet for the U.S. Navy Tuesday.

The P-8A Poseidon, based on a Boeing 737-800 airliner, is set to replace the Navy’s P-3 Orion turboprop airplanes as the Navy’s anti-submarine, anti-surface warfare, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft. The Navy has ordered an initial batch of 13 — on top of the six flight-test and two ground-test airplanes — and ultimately plans to buy 117. The first ones are set to enter operational service next year.

“Delivering this capability to the warfighter is the ultimate goal and we’re proud to be able to meet our commitment and hand over the P-8A ‘keys’ to the Navy fleet,” Chuck Dabundo, Boeing vice president and P-8 program manager, said in a news release.

Rear Admiral Paul Grosklags, U.S. Navy Program Executive Officer for Air Anti-Submarine Warfare, Assault & Special Mission Programs, said the P-8A “will provide the users and operators a step increase in mission capabilities.”

After delivery in Seattle, Navy pilots flew the jet to Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Fla., for use to train air crews. The flight-test P-8As are based at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md.

The basic aircraft goes through Boeing’s 737 production process, ending with assembly in Renton, Wash., and then heads to a facility near Boeing Field, in Seattle, for addition of military systems.

Boeing also has orders for eight P-8I variants for India’s navy. See photos of the P-8A, P-8I and Seattle production facility in the gallery [below].

Read more aerospace news. Visit seattlepi.com’s home page for more Seattle news.

Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/business/boeing/article/Boeing-delivers-first-production-P-8A-to-U-S-Navy-3386899.php#ixzz1ojXaYFsw

VP-4 P2V OFFICERS

REUNION REMINDER!! VP-4 P2V OFFICERS
Next Gathering in Charleston, SC

Francis Marion Hotel
September 11 – 13, 2012
Check out Sept 14

Rooms can be reserved by calling
877-756-2121
Ask for VP4 OFFICERS rate
Cutoff date for our special reunion rate is August 12, 2012

More details to follow soon!
Bob Kessler, Phone 702-363-3307
cruisektc@centurylink.net

Commanding Officer of VQ-1 Relieved

The commanding officer of Naval Air Station Whidbey Island’s Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 1, Cmdr. Jeffrey Wissel, has been relieved of duty while allegations of personal misconduct are investigated.

A brief statement released by Commander, Naval Air Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet said Wissel was relieved late Monday afternoon by Vice Adm. Allen G. Myers.

Executive officer, Cmdr. David Sauve, has assumed command of VQ-1 pending the outcome of the investigation.

“The responsibility of officers in command of their units, their sailors and their mission is absolute; we take their performance very seriously,” the statement read. “Our standards of conduct and performance for commanding officers are extremely high.”

Wissel took command of VQ-1 in April, 2011.

Test Post

Hi folks,

This post is to test the network publishing for the VP-4 Veterans Association. If you see this on Facebook, please comment.

If you see this on Twitter, please reply, or DM, or comment.

 

Thank you,

Video

War Eagles Build Ties in Thailand

War Eagles Build Ties in Thailand.

War Eagles Build Ties in Thailand
By Lt. j.g. Michael Glynn, VP-16 Public Affairs
Posted: February 21, 2012

 

UTAPAO, Thailand – Sailors from the War Eagles of Patrol Squadron (VP) 16 visited Thailand to build regional cooperation and conduct training Feb 6-12.

Click for a closer look.

UTAPAO, Thailand (Feb. 9, 2012) – Lt. Cmdr. Frank Loethen, a mission commander and tactical coordinator assigned to the War Eagles of Patrol Squadron (VP) 16, as explains his duties to Royal Thai navy aviators inside a P-3C Orion. VP-16 is supporting Thailand Sea Surveillance Survey (SEASURVEX) 2012, an annual Thai-U.S. co-sponsored joint exercise designed to enhance interoperability and relations between the Royal Thai navy and U.S. Navy. (U.S. Navy photo)

“Training and sharing ideas with our partners in Thailand was a great experience,” said VP-16 Executive Officer Cmdr. Molly Boron. “It is opportunities like this where U.S. crews practice with our partners, garnering a new perspective and understanding that pays off in the long run with on-station performance when needed.”

War Eagles’ aircrew and maintainers conducted two symposiums with service members of the Royal Thai Navy, sharing their perspectives and experiences in operating P-3 Orion maritime patrol aircraft.

“We’re here to strengthen our ties and enhance our interoperability with the Thai Navy,” said Lt. Cmdr Frank Loethen, to Royal Thai Naval officers during the aircrew symposium.

VP-16 and Thai aviators also discussed capabilities and limitations that appear or happen when conducting joint operations.

Maintenance personnel met with their Thai counterparts in the 102 Squadron of the Royal Thai Navy and exchanged troubleshooting techniques, which help keep the aging airframes in an extremely high state of readiness.

“The chance to meet and work side by side with maintainers of my own background from a different country was an experience I’ll always remember,” said Aviation Structural Mechanic 1st Class Aaron Roberts.

War Eagles’ aircrew flew a training mission with Thai counterparts on board a P-3C Orion that focused on improving maritime domain awareness. The training exercise allowed an opportunity to display capabilities and compare operational experiences, which was beneficial to both parties.

VP-16 operates P-3C Orion maritime patrol aircraft designed as a land-based, long-range, anti-submarine warfare (ASW) patrol aircraft, with missions that include surveillance of the battlespace, either at sea or over land.

The VP-16 is homeported ashore at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Fla. and is currently deployed to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa. VP-16 flies reconnaissance and surveillance missions in support of Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet.

Hangar One’s future needs to be addressed now

Original Article: Fate of Silicon Valley icon hangs in limbo – Therese Polettis Tech Tales – MarketWatch.

By Therese Poletti, MarketWatch

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Anyone who has driven through Silicon Valley has seen the strange concrete and steel hangar that looms just off Highway 101 like an above-ground bunker.

Hangar One, on the former Moffett Field military base adjacent to Mountain View, is large in every sense of the word: it is nearly two hundred feet high, longer than the length of three football fields and 308 feet wide. See slideshow of vintage Hangar One images.

To a few it is an eyesore. But to many, the 79-year-old icon represents what helped create Silicon Valley — engineering and technological prowess, important moments in aeronautics and defense history, marred by the vestiges of an environmental mess.

Built to house Navy dirigibles in 1933, Hangar One is endangered again. An ongoing cleanup to remove the hangar’s toxic siding and save it from demolition lacks funding to finish the job properly. In September, the founders of Google Inc.GOOG -0.30% offered to foot the bill of $33 million or more, through a company that runs their fleet of private planes.

But NASA Ames Research, which owns the hangar and the former military base, has let their offer to pay for the cost to “reskin” the hangar dangle like a moored airship, hovering in the wind.

“We are going to have to reconsider our proposal,” said Ken Ambrose, director of operations for H211, which operates the fleet of seven planes owned by Google Chief Executive Larry Page, co-founder Sergey Brin and chairman Eric Schmidt. “I guess trying to be efficient is out of the federal government’s lexicon.”

The caveat of the offer is that the Google founders want to store their fleet in Hangar One, a 10-minute drive from the Googleplex. The fleet includes a Boeing 767-200 jet airliner; the rest are smaller planes. The H211 company is among a small number of companies and federal agencies with permission to use the former naval airfield. Moffett Field is also where Air Force One lands on President Obama’s Bay Area visits.


Chas. Dye

Air Force One on one of the two airstrips at Moffett Field, with a partially unskinned Hangar One in the background, on Sept. 25, 2011.

A spokesman for NASA Ames said the discussions about the hangar’s future “are being worked at the top levels of government,” perhaps meaning that the White House is involved. “We are optimistic we are heading in the right direction and doing what’s best for the local community,” said spokesman Michael Mewhinney. “We hope to reach a decision later this year.”

Both Ambrose of H211 and locals trying to preserve Hangar One, which is part of an historic district on the National Register and a California civil engineering landmark, said a decision needs to happen soon. The Navy, the hangar’s former owners, has contractors now working on a massive cleanup and removal of the old siding to remove asbestos, PCBs, and other toxic contaminants. The job is about half finished. But the Navy doesn’t have to invest in and install a new skin back on the hangar after the removal is finished, which could expose or damage the steel skeleton.

“The fear is that if the building remains uncovered, it will deteriorate,” said Lenny Siegel, who founded the Save Hangar One committee and is a local environmental advocate. “It’s my belief, but I can’t prove it, that the H211 proposal is snagged in bureaucracy. It’s the larger question of the future of Moffett Field as part of NASA. D.C. thinks of Moffett as a nuisance and not part of their mission. It’s useful, but not a necessity.”

On Monday, NASA’s budget for fiscal 2013 was announced. NASA Ames was spared any cuts. In fact, its budget got a slight increase to $711 million from $690 million in 2012, in part due to the costs to maintain its older buildings. The NASA Ames spokesman declined to comment further on Hangar One and said the decision is being made in Washington.

In addition to potential deterioration if the famous hangar is left uncovered with only a coat of paint, another more ominous problem is at stake. “That is only a temporary measure,” Ambrose said. “As the elements wear on the paint, all those contaminants get into the groundwater again.”

The Navy has also set up a multi-million dollar scaffolding system around the giant structure for the removal project that could be efficiently used again to install new, non-toxic siding on the hangar.

A storied past

Hangar One was initially built to house the USS Macon, one of the largest rigid dirigibles, or airships, that used non-flammable helium to keep afloat. Germany’s successful reconnaissance missions with the rigid airships — called Zeppelins after their inventor — during World War I spurred their adoption in the U.S., England, France and Italy in the 1920s. Dirigibles were valued for their speed and ability to travel long distances without refueling.

The Macon arrived at Hangar One in 1933 and was used for surveillance missions until it crashed into the ocean in a storm off the coast of Point Sur in 1935. All but two of its crew were saved.

Two years later, in 1937, the young airship industry, which by then was exploring Zeppelins for passenger travel, would collapse completely with the disastrous explosion of the hydrogen-filled Hindenberg. Today, new designs of safer airships are undergoing something of a revival for alternative transport of goods, terrain exploration, and again, for military reconnaissance.


Moffett Field Historical Society

In this 1934 U.S. Navy photo, the USS Macon arrives at Hangar One.

“It’s an asset that can not be easily re-created,” said Brian Hall, CEO of Airship Ventures, which uses Hangar Two on Moffett Field, for its Eureka airship. His company, which also offers passenger Zeppelin rides, had its airship built in Germany. See previous column on Airship Ventures

If Hangar One is properly restored it could also be used to build, test or maintain other airships in this burgeoning “airship village,” Hall noted, because of its size and steel frame. In 2010, Northrop Grumman NOC +0.59% won a $517 million contract to build three airships for the U.S. Army. “Why is all this business going to the East Coast?” Hall said.

The USS Macon and Hangar One put Moffett Field on the map, the first inklings of the local defense industry that helped create Silicon Valley.

“It’s an imposing structure,” said Bill Stubkjaer, curator at the Moffett Field Historical Society. “This is almost the beginning of Silicon Valley….If Moffett wasn’t here, I don’t think NASA would have been here and if NASA wasn’t here, I don’t think Lockheed would have been here. This has really led the transformation of Mountain View and Sunnyvale from farming communities to a center of high tech.”

As NASA dawdles, the locals stew, and time passes. And who knows how long H211’s offer will last?

“This is a situation that needs a decision,” Ambrose said.

Therese Poletti is a senior columnist for MarketWatch in San Francisco.

VP-4 awarded Battle ‘E’ for 2011!

COMNAVAIRFOR Announces 2011 Aviation Battle ‘E’ Winners.

COMNAVAIRFOR Announces 2011 Aviation Battle ‘E’ Winners
By Commander, Naval Air Forces Public Affairs

SAN DIEGO, Calif. – Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF) announced the winners of the 2011 Aviation Battle Efficiency (Battle “E”) awards Feb. 10.

The aviation Battle “E” is the Navy’s top performance award presented to the aircraft carrier and aviation squadron in each competitive category that achieves the highest standards of performance readiness and efficiency. The award recognizes a unit’s training and operational achievements while including a balance that incentivizes efficiency.

USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) was the Battle “E” winner of the aircraft carrier category for the West Coast while the USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) won for the East Coast.

“The warfighting excellence shown by these squadrons and the Vinson and the Bush proves them to be the best of the best. I am incredibly proud of their accomplishments,” said Vice Adm. Al Myers, CNAF commander. “In a time of increased demand and a constrained fiscal environment, these Sailors, Officers and Aviators continue to deliver combat effectiveness and to display the professionalism and pride that is the hallmark of Naval Aviation.”

In the aviation squadron competitions, each aviation Type-Commander selects a winner in every category, while CNAF selects the Navy-wide winners, resulting in three sets of recipients.

The 2011 Commander, Naval Air Force Atlantic squadrons selected as Battle “E” winners are:

Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 15, “Valions”, for the VFA-C category
Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 136, “Knighthawks”, for the VFA-E/F category
Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 141, “Shadow Hawks”, for the VAQ CVW category
Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 124, “Bear Aces”, for the VAW category
Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 9, “Tridents”, for the HS/HSC category
Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron Light (HSL) 42, “Proud Warriors”, for the HSL EXP category
Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 28, “Dragon Wales”, for the HSC EXP category
Patrol Squadron (VP) 10, “Red Lancers”, for the VP category

The 2011 Commander, Naval Air Force Pacific Fleet squadrons selected as Battle “E” winners are:

Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 151, “Vigilantes”, for the VFA-C category
Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 2, “Bounty Hunters”, for the VFA-E/F category
Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 131, “Lancers”, for the VAQ CVW category
Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) 113, “Black Eagles”, for the VAW category
Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron (HS) 4, “Black Knights”, for the HS/HSC category
Helicopter Anti-Submarine Squadron Light (HSL) 37, “Easy Riders”, for the HSL EXP category
Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) 23, “Wildcards”, for the HSC EXP category
Patrol Squadron (VP) 4, “Skinny Dragons”, for the VP category

The 2011 CNAF squadrons selected as Battle “E” winners are:

Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 132, “Scorpions”, for the VAQ EXP category
Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) 77, “Saberhawks”, for the HSM category
Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron (HM) 15 “Blackhawks”, for the HM category
Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 2 “Rangers”, for the VQ EW category
Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 4, “Shadows”, for the VQ TACAMO category
Patrol Squadron Special Projects Unit (VPU) 1, “Pirates”, for the VPU category
Fleet Logistics Support Squadron (VRC) 30 “Providers”, for the VRC category

The Battle “E” competition is conducted to strengthen individual command performance, overall force readiness, and to recognize outstanding performance within the naval aviation force.

Grading metrics for attaining the Battle “E” award include: Operational achievement, training, inspection accomplishments, material and personnel readiness, aviation safety, weapon systems and tactics development, and contributions to the aviation community.

Each member attached to a winning ship or squadron earns the right to wear the Battle “E” ribbon on their uniform, or if they already posses that ribbon, they can add an additional “E” device to the ribbon.

Executing the Maritime Strategy

Executing the Maritime Strategy.

Executing the Maritime Strategy

The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) and the Republic of Singapore Navy frigates RSS Formidable (68) and RSS Stalwart (72) are underway

“Together with our allies and partners, we will continue our commitment to maritime security and freedom of the seas in the Asia-Pacific region. We tangibly demonstrate this commitment through credible, purposeful forward presence. Our presence must prioritize the current war-fighting readiness necessary to operate as an effective force across the full range of our maritime strategy.”
– Adm. Cecil D Haney, Commander, U.S. Pacific Fleet

Around the world, the Navy is executing the core capabilities of the Maritime Strategy; examples from January include:

Forward Presence

  • The Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group flew 760 sorties totaling more than 1,090 hours of support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations.
  • Ninety-eight U.S. Navy Reserve Sailors assigned to Navy Expeditionary Logistics Support Group FORWARD provided air cargo, fuels support, and expeditionary support services in Kuwait and Afghanistan.

Maritime Security

Deterrence

  • Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron 4 teams protected Military Sealift Command vessels and other high value units in Kuwait, the Horn of Africa, and Rota, Spain.
  • USS McClusky (FFG 41) departed San Diego for an independent deployment to the Eastern Pacific Ocean in support of Combating Transnational Organized Crime operations.

Power Projection

  • Commander, Task Force 57 flew 198 sorties totaling 1,490 hours in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, counter-piracy and Partnership Strength Presence.
  • USS New Orleans (LPD 19) conducted joint training with the U.S. Army, qualifying AH-64 Apache helicopters for landing on the ship’s flight deck, demonstrating the U.S. military’s flexibility and interoperability.

Building Maritime Partnerships

Humanitarian Assistance / Disaster Response

  • Maritime Civil Affairs Team 205 trained local medical personnel on proper medical incineration procedures and certified a medical incinerator used to prevent the spread of HIV in eastern Kenya.
  • An aircrew assigned to Patrol Squadron 47, operating from Naval Air Station Sigonella, Sicily, helped rescue 68 people adrift on a powerless raft in the Mediterranean Sea.

Status of the Navy (as of Feb. 8, 2012):

Active Duty: 323,773
Officers: 53,120
Enlisted: 266,146
Midshipmen: 4,507
Ready Reserve: 103,805 [As of Dec 2011 ]
Selected Reserves: 63,971
Individual Ready Reserve: 39,834
Reserves currently mobilized: 4,518 [As of 31 Jan 2012]
Personnel on deployment: 47,943
Navy Department Civilian Employees: 203,609
Ships and Submarines
Deployable Battle Force Ships: 285
Total Ships Underway: 118 (41% of total)
Deployed Ships Underway: 61 (21% of total)
Other Underway: 57 (20% of total)
Total Ships Deployed/Underway: 155 (54% of total)
Ships Underway
Aircraft Carriers:
USS Enterprise (CVN 65) – Atlantic Ocean
USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) – 5th Fleet
USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) – 5th Fleet
USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) – 7th Fleet
USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77) – Atlantic Ocean
Amphibious Assault Ships:
USS Peleliu (LHA 5) – Pacific Ocean
USS Wasp (LHD 1) – Atlantic Ocean
USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) – Atlantic Ocean
USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) – Atlantic Ocean
USS Makin Island (LHD 8) – 5th Fleet
Aircraft (operational): 3700+

P-8A makes debut in Bold Alligator exercise

P-8A makes debut in Bold Alligator exercise – Navy News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq – Navy Times.

P-8A makes debut in Bold Alligator exercise

 

By Christopher P. Cavas – Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Feb 7, 2012 19:18:47 EST

Swooping low over the aircraft carrier Enterprise, the Navy’s newest jet looks every bit a war craft, with little to belie its commercial airliner lineage or current test missions.

The P-8A Poseidon maritime multi-mission aircraft apparently made its first appearance in an operational, fleet exercise Feb. 3 when it began flying sorties in support of Exercise Bold Alligator, the largest amphibious exercise in a decade, now taking place along the coasts of Virginia and North Carolina.

The P-8A flew 20 missions in support of the Enterprise and its strike group, and another 14 sorties operating with the amphibious strike group and Marine expeditionary forces, according to U.S. Fleet Forces Command in Norfolk, Va.

That’s a departure from the extensive P-8A flight test programs being flown by Air Test and Evaluation Squadrons 1 and 20 (VX-1 and VX-20) from Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md.

Sporting a spiffy sinking submarine logo on its tail, the VX-1 P-8A photographed from the Enterprise is known as “T-6,” the last of six test and evaluation aircraft delivered to the Navy by Boeing. It was accepted by the Navy and arrived at Pax River on Jan. 17, said LaToya Graddy, a spokesperson for Naval Air Systems Command.

The aircraft also will be used in upcoming operational test exercises set to begin this summer, she added.

The P-8 is under development by the Navy to replace the venerable, turbo-prop P-3 Orion.

The “Sapporo 6″ – Sailors Take on Snow Cube in Annual Snow Festival

The “Sapporo 6″ – Sailors Take on Snow Cube in Annual Snow Festival.

The “Sapporo 6″ – Sailors Take on Snow Cube in Annual Snow Festival

The following blog post, written by Naval Air Facility Misawa Public Affairs Officer Senior Chief Daniel Sanford, takes you on a journey to the 63rd annual Sapporo Snow Festival. This festival is more than just snow sculpting; it’s about building camaraderie and following through on a commitment to reach a common goal… which happen to be characteristics we use in the Navy. Come along as Daniel takes us along this “cool” ride by the “Can Do” team in part ONE of TWO on the event coverage.

Day 1: The “Sapporo Six.” That’s the tremendously-unoriginal moniker I’ve given this year’s Navy Misawa Snow Sculpting Team. Comprised of six handpicked Sailors from various commands on board Naval Air Facility Misawa, they all currently reside on the northern end of Japan’s Honshu Island, in the heart of Misawa City. NAF Misawa is also home to 14 tenant or deployed commands encompassing about 800 Sailors. From this multitude of outstanding Sailors, only six were chosen, thus begetting, well … see the first sentence.

“Sapporo Six” (minus Billy!)

Led by Chief Builder Billy Knox, a Navy Seabee originally from Chapin, Ill., the team is comprised of six Sailors from six unique Misawa Navy Commands: BUC Christopher “Billy” Knox, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Far East Detachment Misawa Misawa; IS3 Class Zachary James, Naval Air Facility Misawa; ET2 Class James Johnston, Commander Task Force 72; CTCSN Herschel Moore,Navy Information Operations Command Misawa; ATAN Trevor Teschel, Patrol Squadron 1; ADAN Alvin Zuilan, Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Detachment Misawa

Having never been formally introduced to each other until today, and with virtually no discernible snow sculpting skills, the team is about to depart on a full-day’s journey from Misawa to Sapporo, located on Hokkaido, Japan’s northernmost island. It is there they will take part in the 63rd Annual Sapporo Snow Festival.

Every year NAF Misawa and its tenant commands send a team of Sailors to the festival to represent the base and the strong relationship it shares with the community.

While there, the team is also tasked with taking part in the festival’s snow sculpture event, in which they attempt to build a sculpture from a six-foot-by-six-foot cube of compacted snow.

Of this year’s team, only Knox has previous experience with snow sculpting, as he led up the team that built last year’s sculptures.

I say sculptures because in 2011, his team built a pretty cool looking “snow anchor,” which unfortunately succumbed to unseasonably warm weather and collapsed just two days before the festival was due to open. But in keeping with this Seabee’s “can-do” spirit, Knox rallied his team forward, and within 18 hours, built the “Phoenix Anchor,” a completely new anchor that proudly jutted toward the Sapporo skyline and remained on display for the more than 200,000 festivalgoers.

Billy Knox

So when asked whether Knox was gun shy about building another creation out of nothing more than snow and the grease of Sailor elbows, he quickly replied in his bastardized Illinois twang, “Hell Nah.”

And true to his word, this year’s creation is not for the meek sculptor. The team has signed on to build a bust of the famous “Lone Sailor” statue. Yes, it’s a head-and-shoulders replica of the monument that currently resides at the U.S. Navy Memorial inWashington D.C. And while the anchor sculpture had a more basic-angular feel, creating detailed facial features from a block of snow certainly represents a whole new set of challenges for the team – the least of which is a deadline of Sunday, Feb. 5.

Whether or not the Sapporo Six are successful depends largely on their teamwork, attitude, commitment, skill and the weather. Thankfully (and I use this word loosely), temperatures will dip into the single digits this week, which should help alleviate the concern of another warm-weather collapse.

But, as Knox said to his team upon meeting them, “Failure is not an option.”

˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

DAY 2: Following a day of travel that featured eight hours on the road in the “snowflake 3000,” interspersed with a four-hour ferry ride from Honshu Island to Hokkaido Island, the “Sapporo Six” were finally in Sapporo.

Their first stop was to the Camp Sapporo “So You Kai” office and a meeting and gift exchange with Camp Sapporo Command Sgt. Maj. Hiroaki Sanpai.

Sanpai and Snow Sculpting Team Leader Chief Builder Christopher “Billy” Knox have grown a close relationship stemming from last year’s visit. When Knox’s first snow anchor sculpture collapsed due to unseasonably warm weather, it was Sanpai who offered assistance with rebuilding it, and personally came out to the site to help Knox and his team rebuild the “Phoenix Anchor.”


After exchanging gift plaques in honor of the close friendship between NAF Misawa and Camp Sapporo, Sanpai took the team out to the site where they’ll be constructing their “Lone Sailor” snow sculpture for the Sapporo Snow Festival.

Since construction of the sculpture wasn’t scheduled until tomorrow, the team had to settle for just looking at the six-foot-by-six-foot block of compacted snow. All agreed they couldn’t wait until tomorrow to start chopping it up.

The team was next escorted to Sapporo City Hall where they met with the city’s tourism manager. The team was served hot tea and each received a “happy coat” as a gift from the city.

The last meeting was with Camp Sapporo’s Garrison Commander and the team once again enjoyed hot tea and a few minutes with the base leadership.

The final event of the day was a get-together dinner hosted by the Camp Sapporo “So You Kai,” which featured dinner and drinks in a very social environment. Each attendee had the opportunity to stand up and formally introduce themself to the crowd. Even though communication may have been difficult with the language barrier, it’s funny how the communication process is easier after a few beers together.

That’s it for today. Tomorrow brings about the first day of sculpting and the “Sapporo Six” are ready to turn a snow cube into a Navy dude.

˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

DAY 3: So with the pleasantries of yesterday complete, the stark challenge facing the “Sapporo Six”

How do you use this…

to make this iconic image…

out of this ice block?

Team Lead, “Billy” Knox, who normally builds things out of concrete, utilized his training as a U.S. Navy Seabee and decided to create a giant snow graph.

The original design that Knox intends to use is on graph paper, so the best way to move forward is to make the creation to scale. So as the temperatures stubbornly remained in the teens, his team began the tedious task of inserting horizontal and vertical lines approximately eight-inches apart. I say approximately, because while the block of compressed snow is supposed to be six-foot-by-six-foot, apparently its creation is not an exact science. So in the words of Knox:

ET2 James Johnston and ATAN Trevor Teschel

“Guess we better improvise.”

Hours later after the graph lines are applied with chalk and the design is roughly inserted into the snow using markers, the team begins chipping, chiseling, and in many instances, pounding away at the enormous snow cube.

ET2 Class James Johnston

Within an hour, a Navy “dixie cup” of sorts began to take form – or a banana – depending on from what angle you were looking at.

Additionally, Naval Air Facility Misawa Command Master Chief Mike Napier, who took leave to be in Sapporo with the team, stopped by to lend a hand (and a chisel). Napier has been a big supporter of the team the past two years and even paid for the team’s snowcaps out of pocket. Although he retires from the Navy next month after 30 years of service, he had the energy of a screamin’ seaman as he climbed all over the sculpture to help remove the excess snow.

But as the hours passed, the frigid temperatures made the sculpting that much more problematic.

“I have on three pairs of socks and I still can’t feel my toes,” said IT3 Zachary James. Although he’s a Seattle native, the Pacific Northwest has nothing on a northern Japan winter.

In fact, very few of these Sailors even come from cold-weather areas. Heck, ET2 James Johnston was born in Hawaii. So the difficulty of the design, along with the long hours spent outside in the frozen Sapporo tundra, will make the next few days very challenging for the team.


By the time the sun began to set, the team had spent about eight hours on the project and the sculpture looked like this:

So while the “the Lone Sailor” looks more like a dangerous loner right now, know that the team will be out here again bright and early again tomorrow morning. First order of business: making that nose a littttle less bulbous. Hooyah, Snow Team!

CHECK BACK Wednesday for the next report on the Sapporo 6!

Your Navy Operating Forward

Your Navy Operating Forward.

Your Navy Operating Forward

Right now your Navy is 100% on watch around the globe helping to preserve the American way of life. Whether it be operating and training in the waters off the coast of Virginia or forward deployed to the South China Sea, the flexibility and presence provided by our U.S. naval forces provides national leaders with great options for protecting and maintaining our national security and interests around the world. The imagery below highlights the Navy’s ability to provide those options by operating forward.

SOUTH CHINA SEA – Flight operations aboard the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74).

ARABIAN GULF – Aviation Boatswain’s Mate (Handling) 2nd Class Tanner Kent guides a U.S. Army AH-64 Apache helicopter off the flight deck of the amphibious transport dock ship USS New Orleans (LPD 18).

ATLANTIC OCEAN – The MK-45 5-inch/.54-caliber lightweight gun fires aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78).

SUEZ CANAL – The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Momsen (DDG 92) passes the Freedom Bridge as it transits the Suez Canal.

ATLANTIC OCEAN – Members of the visit, board, search, and seizure team aboard the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Nitze (DDG 94) board a rigid-hull inflatable boat.

PACIFIC OCEAN Sailors from the air department aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) stand position as a helicopter lifts off from the flight deck.

ATLANTIC OCEAN Landing Craft Air-Cushion (LCAC) 37 maneuvers off the coast of North Carolina during the coalition exercise Bold Alligator 2012 as the amphibious assault ship USS Wasp (LHD 1) is seen in the background.

ARABIAN SEA – An F/A-18F Super Hornet assigned to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 22 launches from the Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70)

To Boldly Go… a tricorder for the Navy?

To Boldly Go… a tricorder for the Navy?.

To Boldly Go… a tricorder for the Navy?

Star Trek‘ movies and TV series spelled big business for Paramount Pictures. Trekkers-and we all know (or are) one-can rattle off dozens of fictional devices straight from the scenes of the sci-fi powerhouse.

But did the movie reel influence a real-life medical device?

We’re not writing this off to the old adage that “life imitates art,” but, it’s pretty hard to dismiss the uncanny functional similarities between Star Trek’s tricorder and the Infrascanner, a device sponsored by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and approved by the FDA December 2011. Both hand-held devices scanned for varying degrees of injury.

The Infrascanner uses near-infrared technology to penetrate the skull and locate bleeding in the brain, according to ONR officials. (Hollywood hasn’t divulged the inner workings of the tricorder just yet.)

“Naval warfighters, on ship or land, may be a great distance away from any definitive medical care,” said Dr. Michael Given, ONR’s program manager for expeditionary medicine, combat casualty care. “So something like this could be very useful, almost essential.”

Current medical imaging machines, like x-rays or MRIs, are too big and heavy for all but the largest ships like aircraft carriers — so you can understand why they don’t work for expeditionary forces in remote locations.

So, while ONR may be focused on equipping ships and personnel with advanced medical technology for actual practice, it may have just set the bar for future explorers to boldly go where no man has gone before.



YouTube DoDLive

Navy Culinary Specialists-Without ‘em the Fleet Don’t Eat

Navy Culinary Specialists-Without ‘em the Fleet Don’t Eat.

Navy Culinary Specialists-Without ‘em the Fleet Don’t Eat

Gone are the days when Navy cooks just sling hash, serve “sh#t on a shingle,” and make Navy bean soup. Today’s culinary specialists (CS’s) are highly trained in preparing nutritious and delicious meals in sometimes less than ideal conditions. Whether it’s grilling on a ship operating in heavy seas, baking in a desert tent, sautéing while submerged in a submarine or braising at ten thousand feet–Navy CSs are deployed around the globe ensuring the men and women of America’s Navy operate at peak performance.

We know this food doesn’t magically appear when our Sailors are ready for it. Much planning and detail goes into menu preparation and food creation. Today’s CS’s have greater culinary instruction than ever before with even more advanced training on the way. Recently instruction and competition events were held in Norfolk and San Diego to help our would-be “Bobby Flays” and “Cat Coras” hone their skills and see how they stack-up against their peers. If you didn’t know any better you would think the clips below were pulled directly from Food Network orGordon Ramsey’s latest show on Fox.

Norfolk–“Top Chop” Mid-Atlantic Regional Galley Competition


San Diego– 5th annual “Iron Chef” Competition for Navy Region Southwest, judged by award winning chef, Sam “The Cooking Guy” Zien, of the Discovery Health network’s, “Just Cook This!”


Key Take Aways Regarding Navy Culinary Specialists:

– More than 7,000 deployed around the globe, feed on average more than 92 million wholesome and nutritious top quality meals per year, ensuring our fighting forces are operating at peak performance to respond to threats worldwide.

– Nothing impacts Sailors on a day-to-day basis more than the great food our CSs prepare for them-these top quality meals directly contribute to Sailor quality of life and morale.

Today’s CSs have greater culinary instruction than ever before-with even more advanced training on the way. Our Sailors, both afloat and ashore can look forward to healthier and better tasting meals in the near future.

Biting Off More Than You Can Chew

Original Article: Biting Off More Than You Can Chew.

Biting Off More Than You Can Chew

This blog post comes from Derek Nelson from the Naval Safety Center who asks – and answers – the question, “is it better to know more than you’ve forgotten?” This “safety guy” gives a serious subject.

I’ve gotten lots of mileage out of two closely-related quotations through the years, and scarcely a week goes by that I don’t gather new evidence as to their basic truth.

The first is from Clint Eastwood’s movie-cop “Dirty Harry” Callahan: “A man’s got to know his limitations.” The second is from 18th-century English poet Alexander Pope, who wrote, “A little learning is a dangerous thing.”

When you are unfamiliar with an activity — you’ve never ridden an ATV or gone rock climbing, for example — you realize that you’re clueless and (one would hope) act accordingly. But after you’ve been doing something successfully for a while, it can be hard to tell how many more skills you need to acquire. Do you know 10 percent of what you need to know, or 90 percent? And where would you like to discover the fact that you’re on the low end of the knowledge scale? I’ll bet that it isn’t when you’re heading into a 35-mph curve on your new motorcycle at 50 mph. Incidentally, believe it or not, there is gravel on roads sometimes, another fact you don’t want to simultaneously discover.

Granted, most of us would rather brag about how great we are. But if you don’t follow Dirty Harry’s advice, activities that start out as fun and exciting end up in painful and expensive trips to the ER. You run the risk of self-inflicting some other limitations, such as how well your arms and legs work. You may be living with those self-inflicted results for a surprisingly long time, and you probably won’t be doing much mountain biking or wake surfing while you heal.

Two social psychologists at a university did a study involving a number of tests. They asked participants to estimate how well they would perform before they took each test. The result: The participants who rated themselves highest did worst. And the reverse was true: People who scored high tended to underestimate their skills. When the people who had overrated themselves got some training, they became less sure of themselves. They had gained a notion of how much more there was to learn.

I’m often surprised (and skeptical) at how much alleged “experience” the people in mishap reports claim to have had at the time they did the bone-headed stunt that landed them in the report. Here’s what doesn’t count as “experience”: bad habits, risky behaviors, and doing something wrong repeatedly. Some people, over the course of a decade, get 10 years of experience; others get one year, repeated 10 times.

Perusing a special “complacency” issue of Approach magazine, I found a terrific one-liner about the cause of aircraft mishaps: “Usually it is because someone does too much too soon, followed very quickly by too little too late.” If that doesn’t describe most of the motorcycle wrecks I’ve read about lately, I don’t know what does: too much acceleration, and too little learning the limitations of the bike’s brakes and the rider’s own skills.

Same goes for a lot of what mishap reports refer to as “inadvertent actuations,” which is the weakest possible way to describe the noise and damage that result when someone fires a weapon by mistake and the round tears a hole in the nearest wall, ceiling, or body part. These mishaps are invariably the result of not following the simple rules of weapons handling, getting way too comfortable with a weapon, and/or not getting enough training (or, more likely, not paying attention to the training someone was trying to give you). They may be highly experienced and have no shortage of learning, but they still underestimate the powers of complacency and distraction.

The basic rules of handling weapons aren’t that hard to follow. And if there is one place where you have to know your limitations, it’s when your index finger is near a trigger.

As with any other exciting and non-mandatory activity involving such things as cliffs, whitewater rapids, snow-covered mountains, noisy engines and adrenaline, the point isn’t to avoid the activity. The point is to do it in a way that ensures you will be able to keep doing it for as long as you please, thereby compiling all sorts of cool memories and priceless experiences. And the way you do that is by getting smart, not by winging it. You overcome limitations not by ignoring them but by acknowledging them.

Granted, this means starting at something less than whatever is the equivalent of turning the volume knob up to 10. So be it. Everybody is in too much of a hurry these days, anyway.

DVIDS – News – Commander, patrol and reconnaissance forces visits ‘War Eagles’

By: Lt. j.g. Michael Glynn
VP-16 Public Affairs

OKINAWA, Japan – Commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Forces 5th and 7th Fleet, paid a visit to Patrol Squadron (VP) 16 Jan. 5-6.

Rear Adm. Sean Buck, held an all-hands “Admiral’s Cal”’ with the “War Eagles” to answer questions and gain deck-plate perspective.

Rear Adm. Sean Buck, commander, Patrol and Reconnaissance Forces 5th and 7th Fleet, addresses sailors from Patrol Squadron (VP) 16 during an all-hands "Admiral's Call." VP-16 is currently forward-deployed to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan. (Photo by: Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Giuliana Mandigo)

“It’s exciting to be visiting the ‘War Eagles,’ said Buck. “They’ve had a phenomenal start to their deployment, and it’s the result of a year of hard work. What they’ve brought to the 7th Fleet is working.”

He also fielded questions on future changes in the maritime patrol community and security in the Western Pacific.

“It’s great to focus on the future of maritime patrol and reconnaissance,” commented Buck. “VP-16 is leading the transition to the P-8A Poseidon. The future of MPRA is very bright.”

VP-16 is a maritime patrol squadron that conducts routine security, surveillance, and reconnaissance missions. The squadron operates the P-3C Orion and is based ashore at Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Fla.

VP-16 is currently forward-deployed to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa and flies in support of Commander, U.S. 7th Fleet.

99 Years and Counting of Family Service from Military.com

View the original article here: 99 Years and Counting of Family Service | Military.com.

WASHINGTON — Commander, Fleet Air Forward and Patrol Reconnaissance Force 5th and 7th Fleets, promoted his son, now a new lieutenant attached to Patrol Squadron Eight in Jacksonville, Fla., during a ceremony held in Sarasota, Fla., Dec. 21.

The promotion was just the latest event in a long tradition of naval service for the Buck family.

Rear Adm. Sean Buck officiated the promotion of his son, Jeff, from lieutenant junior grade to lieutenant in front of the symbolic World War II “Unconditional Surrender” statue in downtown Sarasota. Both are naval flight officers (NFO) in the P-3C Orion aviation community.

Retired Navy Capt. Edward Guy Buck, also a career naval aviator, pinned the lieutenant bars on his grandson.

“I am so happy to be a part of my grandson’s promotion ceremony,” stated the retired captain. “Our family is filled with naval service, and the tradition of serving our great country proudly carries on in the Buck family.”

A Sarasota resident, the eldest Buck is a member of the U.S. Naval Academy’s class of 1948, who served 30 years as a pilot in the P-2V Neptune community after receiving his commission. The P-2V was the predecessor of the modern P-3C.

His first duty station was Patrol Squadron 26 in Patuxent River, Md., the same squadron that his son Sean would later lead as both executive officer and commanding officer.

From 1959-1963, he was attached to the Bureau of Naval Weapons in Wash., D.C., where he served as initiating program manager for Project A-New. That project began the transformation of all aircraft electronic devices from analog to digital systems, which are currently in use in the aircraft the younger Bucks fly in today.

Naval service in the Buck family goes beyond these three men. Buck and his wife Maryln’s eldest son, Edward Jr., also served in the Navy. Maryln’s father, Arthur F. Whittier, another Navy veteran, enlisted in 1913 and retired in 1950 as a lieutenant commander. Buck’s brother, A. Lester Buck, graduated from the Naval Academy in 1945 and served in the submarine force.

Additionally, Buck introduced his sister, Ann Clements, to now-retired Rear Adm. Neal Clements, who served more than 30 years in the Civil Engineer Corps. The Clements had two sons who graduated from the Naval Academy.

“Today is a great day for our Navy, our family and for the newest lieutenant in the United States Navy, Lieutenant Jeff Buck. Ninety-nine years of naval service and counting,” proudly stated Rear Adm. Buck.

 

Orions of Arabia

The following is a re-print of an article from NAVAL AVIATION NEWS September-October 1991

 

Orions of Arabia
Patrol Squadrons in Desert Shield/Storm
By LCdr. Rick Burgess

The following account is consolidated from articles and press releases from LCdr. Mike L’Abbe (PAO, Commander Patrol Wings, Atlantic), Ens. Chinastas Mangronos (PAO, Commander Patrol Wing One), and LTjg. Jake Elston and Ens. Randy Schriver of VP-1 and VP-4.

 

In Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm, the job of the US Naval forces deployed in support of the US Central Command (CENTCOM) was tremendously simplified by the total lack of submariner’s in the Iraqi Navy. However, the U.S. Navy’s patrol squadrons (VPs) did not sit idle during operations for lack of a mission; in fact, their performance in the antishipping and surveillance role in support of the economic sanctions and battle group operations is the story of one qualified success.

First on the Scene

When Iraqi forces rolled into Kuwait on August 2, 1990, VP-1, home based at NAS Barbers Point, Hawaii, was settled into a routine deployment to NAS Cubi Point in the Philippines, with a detachment in Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Within 48 hours, some of the squadrons P3-C Orions were positioned to an airfield on Al Masirah, an island off the coast of Oman, with the rest of the squadron redeploying from Cubi to Diego Garcia. There, VP-1’s CO, Cmdr. Bill Eckardt, became Commander Task Group (CTG) 72.8, and the XO Cmdr. J. H. Miller, established Task Unit 72.8.3 at Al Masirah. VP-1’s crews were the first American forces to arrive in the Persian Gulf region to augment the six ships of the Middle East Force.

The P-3s immediately began surveillance flights to enforce economic sanctions against Iraq. When the independence (CV – 62) battle group arrived in the North Arabian Sea on August 6, the detachment quickly blended its operations with the battle group. A Mobile Operations Command Center (MOCC) was transported from Barbers Point to Al Masirah and set up in a tent to serve as the focal point of the maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) operations in the Persian Gulf. P-3C Update I aircraft and crews from VP-19, deployed to NAF Misawa, Japan, from NAS Moffett Field, California, arrived in short order to augment VP-1. 12 days after the invasion, another attachment was established in Jeddah, a base on the Red Sea coast of Saudi Arabia. Jeddah would serve as the base for surveillance patrols of the Red Sea.

Interdiction

From Al Masirah and Jeddah the P-3s ranged all over the Persian Gulf and Red Sea as key elements of the Maritime Interdiction Force, locating and identifying shipping and vectoring coalition warships to interceptions, often involving inspection and boarding. These operations were successfully blended with Royal Air Force Nimrod and French Aeronvale Atlantique MPA, which were also deployed to the region in support of Desert Shield. The radar and infrared detection sets (IRDS) on the P-3s became important sensors in the interdiction effort. Regarding one ship, the IRDS was able to detect painted out Iraqi markings under newly painted false Egyptian markings foiling the deception effort. P-3s were also used to escort convoys from the Suez Canal through the Red Sea, and to provide antiterrorist protection to the battle groups at night. P-3 crews used handheld VHF radios to interrogate thousands of merchant ships on their identities and cargoes “it was like dialing an international operator and asking for anywhere – you knew English was going in, but you never knew what language was going to come out,” according to AW3 Darrell Wooley.

During desert shield the combined efforts of coalition MPA patrols resulted in the interception of over 6,300 ships. In one highly publicized incident Barak attempted to label the supply ship Ibn Khaldoon a “peace ship” in order to circumvent the embargo. P-3s tracked this vessel continually, leading to its boarding by the crew of a U.S. Navy warship.

Atlantic Augment

On September 23, 1990, CENTCOM requested and MPA augment from the U.S. Atlantic Command. NAS Brunswick, Main based VP-23, maintaining a detachment at NAS Bermuda, was ordered to send a detachment to Jeddah. Three P-3C Update IIs, led by VP-23 C.O., Commander Brown Word, were positioned at King Faisal Naval Base to relieve the VP-1 detachment at Jeddah. With this change, operational command of the det. now named Detachment Charlie, came under Rear Admiral Peter Cressy, Commander Task Force 67. On October 31, VP-11, then deployed to NAS Sigonella, Sicily, sent a detachment of P-3C Update II.5s under Lieutenant Commander William Martin to Jeddah to relive the VP-23 det. by then Lieutenant Commander Joseph Julius. As part of normal rotation, VP-8 relieved VP-11 at Sigonella and on December 7 assumed operation of Detachment Charlie. VP-8’s P-3C Update II.5s, under Lieutenant Commander Mark Kirk and Later Lieutenant Commander Paul Hulley, remained the core of the detachment throughout Desert Storm.

The interdiction effort was not limited to the Red Sea and Persian Gulf. Tracking shipping of interest in the Mediterranean was a major activity of VP-11 and later VP-8 from Sigonella, as well as the P-3C Update IIIs of VP-45 and later VP-5, deployed to Rota, Spain, from NAS Jacksonville, Fla.

Building for the Storm

As Desert Shield proceeded, the MPA force in the Middle East was changing and growing. By late August Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron (VQ) 1 established an EP-3E detachment at Bahrain. By mid-September, a detachment from Barbers Point based Patrol Special Projects Unit (VPU) 2 arrived in theater with reconnaissance-specialized P-3s (VPU-1 at Brunswick would also send P3’s later to the Gulf region). On November 10, as a normal rotation, Barbers Point based VP-4 (with P-3C Update I’s) relieved VP -1 at Diego Garcia and Al Masirah. VP-4 C.O. Commander Bob Cunningham, took over CTG 72.8 and his X.O. Commander Carlos Badger, assumed the det. at Al Masirah. VP-19 continued its augment from Misawa, and additional P-3C Update IIIs and crews from Moffett Field based VPs 40 and 46 also joined in, as well as one plane and crew from each of the reserve units VP-91 and VP Master Augment Unit, Moffett. The MOCC at Al Masirah was beefed up with watch officers, intelligence specialist, and support personnel from Diego Garcia and reserve unit ASWOC-1080 from Moffett field. Captain Phil Lenfant, Commander Task Force 72, Seventh Fleet’s operational commander for the MPA, exercised command over the force.

By January 1991, with the number of carrier battle groups deployed to the theater about to increase from four to six, the MP a force in the region was well exercise than ready for the storm to come. On January 4 round-the-clock surveillance missions in the northern Persian Gulf began. Using radar and special optical sensors, P-3s were used to pinpoint military targets along the Iraqi and Kuwaiti coasts.

Lethal Partnership

When the war began on January 17, P-3s were providing 65 hours of support per day for the battle groups in the Persian Gulf. In addition to defensive surveillance for the battle groups, P-3s went on the offensive and formed a “lethal partnership” with the carrier base strike aircraft that scourged the Iraqi Navy.

Some of the P-3s operating the Gulf were equipped with the APS-137 inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR), which not only detects targets over the horizon but provides images of the target in sufficient detail for the operator to classify the type. ISAR proved especially effective in detecting small craft in the coastal waterways and among the oil rigs the clutter the Gulf. Combining ISAR information with highly accurate locating data from the Global Positioning System made for extremely valid target solutions. Positioned in the northern Gulf, ISAR equipped P-3s routinely detected Iraqi vessels, informed the battle group commander using the P-3s extensive communication suite, and often vectored A-6 and FA-18 jets in for the kill. This model hunter killer coordination in 31 separate engagements resulted in the confirm destruction of 53 of the 105 Iraqi vessels put out of action during the war.

During one 34 hour period, P-3s provided the detection and target locating information that resulted in a substantial reduction in the Iraqi Navy’s offense of capability. A group of 15 Iraqi vessels heading for Maridim Island, an outpost in Kuwaiti hands was detected by VP-4s Crew Five, who vectored strike aircraft against the force, resulting in five ships sunk and seven more damaged. This effort ended what would be Iraqis last seaborne assault.

Hours later, VP-4s Crew 2 detected a group of Iraqi vessels attempting a rapid transit from Iraqi ports around Bubiyan Island, apparently trying to reach the safety of Iranian territorial waters. P-3s from VPs 4, 19, and 45 provided the target locations for the strike aircraft which destroyed 11 Iraqi vessels in what has been named the Battle of Bubiyan.

The Orions were also used in a variety of other roles, including mine hunting and tracking the physicians of oil slicks in the Persian Gulf.

“When’s the Next Launch?”

The pace of were meant a grueling flight schedule, but the VP detachments never missed a sortie, eight tribute to the superb efforts of maintenance personnel operating from limited facilities at the end of a long supply chain. The dedication of the VP detachment personnel was noted with pleasure by Cdr. Cunningham: “I have never been prouder of any group of airmen – both officer and enlisted – as these of Task Group 72.8… they proved themselves in the skies above the Gulf. When they landed all they want to know was when their next launch was!”.

From the outbreak of hostilities on January 17 until the provisional cease-fire on February 27, the VP detachments flew 3,787 hours in 369 combat sorties. The end of the fighting did not mean an end to patrols, however. The detachments remain in place providing shipping surveillance to enforce the sanctions. As during Desert Shield VP-17 relieved VP-4 at Al Masirah in May, and VP-10 took over Detachment Charlie from VP-8 in June. VP-5 has also supplied aircraft and crews to Detachment Charlie.

Maritime patrol operations during Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm proved to be a paragon of flexibility, providing the vital link between the antisurface warfare commander and his strike forces. Rear Admiral Ronald Zlatoper, Antisurface Warfare Commander for Battle Force Zulu in the Persian Gulf, congratulated the MPA forces for their achievements: “… You contributed directly to the destruction of the Iraqi Navy by detecting, identifying, and targeting hostile surface contacts. Your continuous operations were critical to the offensive operations of Battle Force Zulu during Operation Desert Storm.”