New Leadership for Patrol Squadron FORTY « VP-40 News.

This article is from Patrol Squadron 40 and is additional information to this post

New Leadership for Patrol Squadron FORTY

by LTJG Daniel Buccola

Whidbey Island, WA – The Fighting Marlins of Patrol Squadron FORTY (VP-40) held its change of command ceremony May 6, 2011, as CDR John M. Maxwell handed the reins to CDR Brett W. Mietus.

The ceremony marked VP-40’s 60th change of command since its commissioning on January 20, 1951. The squadron was joined by guest of honor, Navy CAPT Doug Morgan, former CPRW-10 Commodore, as well as family, friends, and other distinguished visitors at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island.

Skipper Maxwell took command May 7, 2010 after VP-40 returned from its Fifth Fleet and Sixth Fleet deployments. The Inter Deployment Readiness Cycle (IDRC) has proved many accomplishments. The Fighting Marlins flew 3422.6 flight hours, adding to the squadron’s 272,442 hours of mishap-free flight. More impressively, VP-40 is prepared to go out the door to Seventh Fleet with eleven crews qualified in Anti-Submarine warfare, and twelve crews qualified in Anti-Surface warfare, and Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance readiness.

”The Officers, Chiefs, and Sailors in VP-40 have done amazing things this home cycle. They have responded so well to every challenge. I am particularly honored to have been their Skipper.” CDR Maxwell’s next assignment will take him and his family to Norfolk, Virginia.

As the Marlins prepare for the approaching deployment, CDR Mietus is determined to continue VP-40’s home-cycle achievements. ”There is no better deployment for a P-3 squadron than the one we’re about to experience,” said CDR Mietus. “Our daily efforts make clear that the squadron is ready to deploy. I look forward to seeing what our Sailors are able to accomplish.“

CDR Brett Mietus is a native of Richmond, Virginia, and graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy. Mietus began his naval officer career with VP-9 in 1995. After several Fifth Fleet deployments and a Seventh Fleet deployment, Mietus returned to Jacksonville, Florida to lead the Aircraft Improvement Program (AIP) fleet introduction and be a plankowner for the community’s first Weapons and Tactics Instructor (WTI) class.

Following CDR Mietus’s tour onboard the USS JOHN C STENNIS as the Flag Secretary for Commander, Carrier Group SEVEN in 2001, Mietus earned a Masters of Arts degree with Highest Distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies at the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island. In December 2003, Mietus served with VP-4 and lead a five-site deployment in support of IRAQI FREEDOM and ENDURING FREEDOM.

In 2005, CDR Mietus served on the OPNAV Staff as the Deputy Executive Assistant to the Director, Air Warfare, at the Pentagon. Two years later, he transferred to the Eastern Europe and Eurasia division of the Strategic Plans and Policy directorate on the Joint Staff where he led Russian and Baltic policy efforts

In 2010, CDR Mietus joined his third operational P-3 squadron in Whidbey Island as the Executive Officer. Mietus brings motivation and the fortitude to lead the Fighting Marlins through a rewarding Seventh Fleet deployment.

”Over our training cycle, the Fighting Marlins have been tested and hardened. They are ready to represent our great nation with pride and excellence as we forward deploy.”

The Times Record > News > When the Navy goes, so will he.

Denny Barrett reflects on nearly half a century of service at BNAS

By Seth Koenig, Times Record Staff

BRUNSWICK — Brunswick Naval Air Station reopened after a five-year hiatus in 1951 as relations between the United States and the Soviet Union chilled into decades of Cold War. Just more than a decade later, in 1962, Denny Barrett arrived for duty with Patrol Squadron 26. 

Both will head into retirement together. When the base is decommissioned as a military installation a week from today, Barrett will work his last day there.

The Springfield, Ill.-born Barrett spent 20 years as a Navy sailor stationed in Brunswick. Since retiring from the Navy, he stayed at the air station in civilian jobs, with the exception of a brief stint working for a driving school during the early 1980s.

Barrett has been working in one capacity or another at Brunswick Naval Air Station for nearly 50 years of the base’s 60-year Cold War life.

 

“There was no question I was going to stay here,” Barrett, now 68, recalled of his first impression of the Brunswick base. “It was small. There weren’t a whole lot of people around, and I just felt very, very comfortable.

“Everybody seemed to know what everybody else in the community was doing,” he continued with a laugh. “They only read the papers to see who got caught.”

When the time would come, every three years or so, for Barrett to get new orders and potentially be relocated somewhere new, he would finagle ways to stay at Brunswick Naval Air Station. He went from shore duties assigned to the base to sea duties assigned to squadrons located at the base, trading billets as necessary to remain at his beloved Brunswick site.

Once, when his squadron prepared for deployment, he broke his leg skiing and was grounded back at the base while the surveillance planes took off without him.

Though he did log thousands of flight hours in the old P-2 Neptune reconnaissance planes and then the base’s signature P-3 Orions, Barrett’s wife, Mary Jo, said fellow sailors joked that her husband had “never set his big toe in the water” in all of his years in the Navy.

“They’d say, ‘With Denny, the only time he got sea duty was when he crossed the bridge over to Topsham,’” Barrett acknowledged with a laugh.

 

During his almost half-century associated with the base, he said he’s seen a lot change.

“The barracks that I lived in are gone,” he said. “Three hangars are gone. A new fuel farm was built to replace one that had been there for more than 40 years.”

The base’s fuel farm, which supplied fuel for planes using the airfield, is where Barrett spent most of his civilian work life. From 1989 until last year, he worked at the site, most recently overseeing the subcontractors who managed the operation.

In that capacity, he had a unique view of regular air shows, as well as the government VIPs who would use the Navy landing strips in Brunswick, including three former U.S. presidents during the past two decades: George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

The elder Bush, he recalled, was particularly low-key. The Bush family keeps a vacation home in Kennebunkport.

“He wasn’t pushy,” Barrett said. “He didn’t say, ‘I want this’ or ‘I want that.’ He just liked coming in, going on his fishing trips and leaving.”

Barrett said he never met one of the visiting presidents in person, but oversaw their refueling needs, and said their Secret Service details were professional and courteous.

Looking back on his days as an active-duty sailor, Barrett said the tragedies have stuck with him all these years. During the war in Vietnam, in separate incidents over the Gulf of Thailand in February and in April of 1968, two Patrol Squadron 26 aircraft were shot down. The entire crew of each plane perished.

Barrett said he was picked to lead the prayers during the memorial services held for his lost squadron mates.

“That was an emotional moment for me,” he said. “It was a privilege to be able to stand up there in front of the squadron and do that.”

Like many sailors and Navy retirees living in the Mid-coast, Barrett has become a fixture in the community — in his case, through decades of officiating high school sporting events, and memberships with American Legion Post 202 and the Knights of Columbus. Barrett said the closure of the base saddens him, in part, because that pipeline to diverse and volunteer-oriented Navy personnel will close as well.

Barrett has two sons and a daughter living in the Mid-coast region — Denny Jr., Jonathan and Kelly — and another son, Michael, living in Virginia.

“I’ve been very happy here, and I’m sad to see the base go,” he said. “I’m sad about it because it’s been my home away from home. I’m sad for the people in town, who will lose that relationship between the Navy and the community. There were a lot of Navy people who did a lot for the community, and there were a lot of people from the community who did a lot for the Navy.”

He said he enjoyed his job at the fuel farm and would have been happy to continue working there if the federal Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) commission didn’t choose in 2005 to close the Brunswick base.

“What am I going to do in retirement? I’m just going to say, ‘I don’t have to get up in the morning,’” Barrett said. “I may do that for a month, or I may do that for a week. I’m kind of looking forward to it.

“But I really don’t think I worked with a bad person at the base,” he continued. “I got along with all of them. If it hadn’t been picked to close, I could’ve gone forever.”

skoenig@timesrecord.com

 

DVIDS – News – Patrol Squadron 9 changes commanders.

Cmdr. Richard W. Prest, incoming commanding officer, Patrol Squadron 9, receives his Command-At-Sea pin from his wife during a change of command ceremony May 12 at Hangar 104. Prest will wear the badge during his term as commanding officer. Prest replaced Cmdr. David G. Whitehead, outgoing commanding officer, VP-9. (Photo courtesy of Mindy Clepper)

MARINE CORPS BASE HAWAII – Cmdr. Richard W. Prest relieved Cmdr. David G. Whitehead as commanding officer of Patrol Squadron 9 during a ceremony held in Hangar 104 here, May 12.

Whitehead departed after serving as commanding officer since May 2010.

Under his leadership, the squadron enjoyed a successful deployment to 5th and 7th Fleets, where they earned several accolades, including the 2010 Arnold Jay Isbell Trophy for Anti-Submarine Warfare Excellence, and the 2010 Retention Excellence Award.

His leadership was the catalyst for furthering fleet security cooperation efforts through the completion of fifteen detachments supporting key regional partners. Additionally, VP-9 supported prosecutions on a multitude of high priority sub-surface targets and participated in the establishment of expeditionary maritime patrol and reconnaissance operations at Sheik Isa Air Base, Bahrain. His leadership also played a vital role in continuing the squadron’s safety record of 188,000 mishap-free hours over 32 years.

He successfully led his aircrew and maintenance departments thorough numerous missions and detachments, enabling them to attain a 92 percent mission completion rate for over 500 sorties. Whitehead is slated to take up duties at the Bureau of Naval Personnel in Millington, Tennessee.

Prest assumed command of VP-9 after serving as squadron executive officer for the past year. He began his career upon graduation from the United States Naval Academy in 1992 with a Bachelor of Science degree in economics, and earned his “wings of gold” in April 1995 at Naval Air Station Corpus Christi, Texas.

Prest completed a tour at the Pentagon, serving in the J-3 Operations Directorate of the Joint Staff, before reporting to VP-9 as the squadron executive officer.

Cmdr. Craig Mattingly joined VP-9 as the squadron’s new executive officer. He arrived from a tour at the Naval Air Systems Command.

Transitioning from the P3 to the P8 | SLDInfo.

05/24/2011 Transitioning from the P3 to the P8: A Sea Change in Maritime Surveillance

During the visit in San Diego in late March 2011 to the Naval Air Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, Second Line of Defense sat down with Commander Jake Johansson to discuss the evolution of maritime surveillance. Johansson discussed the transition from the P3 to the P8 and the evolution of the maritime surveillance mission area. As a lifelong maritime surveillance professional, Johansson provided a sweeping review of where the USN has come and where it is going in this vital mission area. Commander Johansson is CNAF Maritime Readiness/CNAP Deputy Operations.

Commander Johansson Druing the SLD Interview

Credit: SLD 2011

SLD: Can you provide us with an overview of the evolution of the mission area for maritime surveillance platforms?

Johansson: When I started on the P3s, there was definitely an ASW threat; 98-percent of the flights I flew where maritime missions. We tracked other nation’s submarines just as often as we tracked our own when I first started out in the community in the early 80s.With the end of the Cold War, this changed and we re-focused our mission to remain relevant in the fight. We updated our aircraft with the AIP suite and began flying over land more than flying in the maritime eventually supporting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan quite extensively.

As I said, during my first tour, 98-percent of my flights were over water, and about 50 to 60 to 70-percent of those we’re doing ASW, whether it was search, localize or tracking other world submarines. During my last deployment, with few exceptions our squadron never flew over water except for transits. Most of my tactical flights were over land supporting OIF. This is not true of all deployed squadrons but it happened to be true for my squadron and was representative of the last 4 or so squadrons that preceded ours in Iraq.

Even though we had migrated over land somewhat, our primary mission area has always been and will always be focused in the maritime environment. We are always striving to get back to the basics of our primary mission area, which is ASW. Our community feels that if you can grasp the complexity of ASW as a whole, then you can use those tactical and crew resource management skills over in our other mission areas of anti-surface warfare as well as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.

SLD: The P8 is not a simple replacement for the P3. Could you talk to the replacement approach and process?

Johansson: What the Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Force is moving toward is a family of systems that include the P8, the systems that are in our other variants of aircraft and the broad air and maritime surveillance UAV, or BAMS. Those platforms, supported by the Tactical Operations Centers and Mobile Tactical Operations Centers can provide 24/7/365 Maritime Domain Awareness if required. We have two variants of the baseline P-3 right now in addition to our P-3 AIP platform. The vision is to migrate the capabilities from those two variants into the Family of Systems offloading capabilities to BAMS and the P-8. The P-8s open architecture lends itself to the migration of some of these systems from the current platforms and we hope to do that in future increments of the P-8.

SLD: What is the planned fleet size?

Johansson: The current thinking is we need 12 squadrons, 7 aircraft each, and so the total would be around 120. The budget is tight so we will see what the final number in the future but 120 is what we would like to see. The initial operational capability (IOC) is in 2013 and FOC is in 2020, for all increments.

SLD: How will you handle littoral operations, which are very challenging for maritime surveillance?

Johansson : First of all, the littoral is challenging for everyone, friend and foe and the MPRF will not be alone in the littoral accomplishing maritime surveillance. Our community can bring quite a few sensors to the fight in the littoral and we continue to develop capabilities that can withstand the harsh littoral environment. The Family of Systems, P-8 and BAMS would be able to support the Maritime Component Commander in the Littoral within all our mission areas. We will have the ability to off-load the tactical information we are receiving via multiple communication paths keeping the CSG/ESG/JFMCC/COCOM aware of what we are doing as well. Obviously, queuing will go a long way to getting the MPRF where we are wanted and results in more time on the targets our warfare commanders are interested in.

I think as we migrate, and there are unresolved operational issues with working in the littoral with P8. The P8 is envisioned by some as being a higher altitude ASW platform. I don’t foresee the P-8 primarily operating at higher altitudes in all tactical phases of flight and in fact, the P-8 is designed to fly through the entire range of the P-3 flight envelope. This will be a process of education as we start fielding the P-8. How do we work in littoral with at a higher altitude with other players in the mix? In the past during the Cold War in a blue water environment, we used to drop buoys from high altitude all the time, there was nobody else out there. In a littoral, I envision multiple friendly surface and low flying aircraft below you, and all these surface warriors and aviators below you are a little concerned about you dropping sonobuoys from high altitude. As our CONOPS matures we will have to work to ensure deconfiction and the safety of those below us.

SLD: What advantages does the P-8 bring to the overall maritime surveillance effort?

Johansson: The P8 gives you a range of capabilities that could be flexibly used in different ways. They will allow you the ability to fly from different bases farther from the fight. The ability to reach more distant operational areas may impact our onstation time but the increased reliability of the aircraft and the inflight refueling capability will ultimately result in a force with increased responsiveness as well as more capability and flexibility for Combatant Commanders. We can protect our P8 fleet a little bit better by having a little bit of distance between us and the fight as well. We will also be able to rapidly get into theater or into that area of responsibility that we need to be in, do our business and come back.

A Boeing P-8A Poseidon test conducts a test flight June 5, 2009.

Credit: USN Visual News Service 06/05/09

SLD: What about the challenge of transition?

Johansson: The crews will experience a challenging transition. Most squadrons come home from deployment as a P3 crew, take their leave, and start the P8 transition. Six months later, they will be P8 crews. It’s a very compressed transition. We envision a squadron taking 18 months between deployments to transition and redeploy.

SLD: One advantage of a manned versus unmanned platform is the ability of the crews to communicate with ground forces. Could you comment on your judgments in this area?

Johansson: Some of our most rewarding missions have been when a General from a ground force calls you directly on the radio and tells you what he needs. You provide him with the surveillance or reconnaissance he required and a short time later you see Marines or soldiers taking care of the issue.BAMS is designed as a tactical adjunct to the P-8. As long as BAMS remains in that role, the combined capability of the P-8/BAMS aircraft actually offers ground forces far more capacity and capability. However, if BAMS becomes more of a strategic asset, it may be more difficult for a war fighter on the ground to get it in a position where it will do him some good tactically. The operators are not within line of sight of the ground forces so the command and control to move UAVs around gets a little tricky, especially if they are being employed strategically but are required tactically. I think the P-8 will continue to be used tactically and provide a little more flexibility for the ground forces to utilize tactically. Persistence may not be as good as the BAMS with its long dwell time but there is some merit to having a man in the cockpit with eyes on overhead. I point out that you concentrated on ground forces. I would like to mention again that our interest is getting back to the maritime environment where we would be able to provide maritime domain awareness for the Fleet with the persistence of BAMS and the capabilities of the P-8 Poseidon.

SLD: And these are really not unmanned, except airborne?

Johansson: I’m not a big fan of calling them unmanned anymore. I call them remotely-piloted, because it takes a lot of people to operate these systems. We moved to the family of systems (BAMS and P-8) because we felt that we could move some of the persistent ISR capabilities to a more capable platform, BAMS. BAMS long dwell time can provide the persistence necessary more efficiently than a rotation of P-8 24/7/365. Also, if we used P-8 to do that we would have to increase squadron manpower to give them the necessary crews to fly 24/7 MDA in addition to the ASW/ASUW missions. We hope to have 5 orbits flying 24/7/365 to cover the maritime picture were required. The great thing about BAMS and P-8 is that they can work together to meet the COCOMS requirements. BAMS can provide the persistence and the P-8 can be used to conduct the specialized skill-sets that the BAMS cannot. BAMS can provide you the maritime picture while the P-8 either responds to BAMS intelligence or conducts ASW/ASUW. This Family of Systems concept can become quite a lethal combination if we employ it correctly.

Chesterfield native Brett Mietus named Navy Commander | Village News: Chesterfield County, Virginias Community News.

Chesterfield native Brett Mietus named Navy Commander

Anne Ditch pins husband Paul with his US NAVY Command at Sea pin.

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. — Lafayette native Paul K. Ditch has taken command of Patrol Squadron VP-45, a Navy P-3C squadron based ashore in NAS Jacksonville.

Commander (CDR) Ditch, a 1981 graduate of Cathedral-Carmel High School in Lafayette, relieved CDR Michael D. Doherty in ceremonies last Friday (06 May 2011).
In remarks as he took command, CDR Ditch spoke of the many successes of the Pelican family and praised the men and women of the squadron for their dedication, loyalty and professionalism and thanked the families of VP-45 sailors, recognizing the sacrifices that enable the Pelicans to accomplish their job.

CDR Ditch could not be reached for comment.

As commander, Ditch will lead the Pelicans in their upcoming tri-site deployment in June.

Ditch enlisted in the Navy in 1987. As a first tour aviation anti-submarine warfare operator, he was stationed at the ASW Operations Center, Roosevelt Roads, Puerto Rico, and as an instructor at HSL-41 at NAS North Island.

 
He earned his bachelor’s degree in business management from the University of LaVerne in 1993, was commissioned as an ensign from Aviation Officer Candidate School, and earned his Naval Flight Officer Wings of Gold in 1994.

Original article can be found at: http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20110510/NEWS01/105100302/Lafayette-native-becomes-Navy-s-newest-skipper

VP Associations,

In recognition of the Centennial of Naval Aviation (CoNA), the 2011 Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Heritage Celebration will be held on-board NAS Jacksonville from 4-6 April, 2011 in conjunction with the annual MPRF Reunion. Heritage events run from Monday-Wednesday and include a Flight Suit Dinner with guest speaker Vice Admiral Myers, Commander Naval Air Forces. Other highlights include a Heritage Fly-in, Heritage Golf Tournament, PBY Monument rededication and more. As we are looking for maximum participation from every era of MPR aviation, the events are open to all current and past MPRF warriors.

Information on the event, as well as, registration, is provided on the CoNA website (www.mprfcona.org).

The website includes information on travel, lodging, base info and a detailed description of each event. There is a $20 registration fee, which includes an official patch and coin designed for the celebration. The event is fully supported by the MPRF and we intend to make it one of the most memorable events to date.

We are reaching out to the reunion groups as our first and most important step in getting full participation for this event. In order to include every individual, any rank, that has ever worked in our community, we are asking for the reunion groups to reach out to their members, as well as post the information on their websites. We are aware the reunion groups are planning their 2011 gathering and hope our event will coincide with it.

During the “heritage dinner,” we will be introducing the inductees into the inaugural “Hall of Honor.” The inaugural MPRF Hall of Honor will set a precedent of honoring the men and women who have helped shape the heritage of our community and/or displayed acts of heroism in and out of combat. Beginning in 2011, these individuals will be honored in conjunction with future Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Force Reunions.

We are currently looking for nominations to the inaugural MPRF Hall of Honor. These nominations will be gathered via the MPRF Centennial of Naval Aviation (CoNA) Celebration website (www.mprfcona.org) and judged by a panel of MPRF Flag Officers. Once approved, the 2011 selectees will be presented at the MPRF Heritage Dinner during the CoNA Celebration. The requirements for submission are any members who have made significant contributions which have shaped Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Force heritage or displayed acts of heroism during the following eras: WWII, Korea, Vietnam, The Cold War, Post Cold War, and Global War on Terror.

Any suggestions, ideas and assistance would be greatly appreciated, as we plan this first-of-its-kind event. Your help, in particular, in promoting the MPRF Centennial of Naval Aviation Celebration will be the foundation that makes this a historical event. We look forward to working with you.

Very Respectfully,
Rob Wilkerson
LCDR USN
MPRF CoNA Coordinator